Instead of taking the nearest candidates to , we can look for a set of candidates whose centroid is close to . The N-convex algorithm works by finding the closest colour to a given target colour for iterations, where the target is first initialised to be equal to the input pixel. Every iteration the closest colour added to the candidate list, and the quantisation error between it and the original input pixel is added to the target.
Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
，推荐阅读safew官方版本下载获取更多信息
2026-02-27 19:00:00
Nature, Published online: 24 February 2026; doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10298-w